As part of the Herald's 150th anniversary last month, the editor, Shayne Currie, answered readers' questions online. Responding to one on demographics, Shayne conceded the paper's readership was now mostly the over-40s, unsurprising given the startling ignorance exhibited when one talks to folk in their 20s. Why is this?
With a colleague a fortnight ago, I stood chatting across the road from the Auckland Art Gallery as three young women approached, walking very, very slowly, heads down, gazing at their cellphones. As readers will surmise, they weren't reading the Times online; rather they were victims of the texting disease that has turned so many young people into zombies.
We stood quietly awaiting the inevitable and, sure enough, one duly bumped into me. "Happen often?" I inquired and she gigglingly conceded to hitting the occasional lamp-post. So, too, the report from Melbourne of a young woman so obsessed with her phone while walking on St Kilda pier, she walked right off and almost drowned.
We can mock but it's becoming a serious addiction problem, particularly with young girls, and is causing havoc with their mothers, as I constantly hear. Although not just them: an academic friend of mine regaled me over lunch a week back about his dismay at delivering university lectures to a wall of bowed heads, all texting away and Facebooking. That wasn't supposition. He'd sent out roving spies to examine what they were looking at.
But here's the point. If from the time their children could read, parents had introduced them to newspapers, as certainly happened when I was young, rather than addiction to idiotic texting, they would, instead, be addicted to the world in all of its wide-ranging fascination and zaniness (the human factor), as delivered to us daily in the newspaper.