The 28-year-old man was found guilty of Mrs Gotingco's rape and murder on May 21. Photo / TVNZ
The man found to have killed Aucklander Blessie Gotingco made a bid to get a Court of Appeal judge to recuse herself from ruling on his bid for continued name secrecy.
The 28-year-old was found guilty on May 21 of the rape and murder of Mrs Gotingco, a mother of three.
Today, the Court of Appeal met to decide whether the prisoner's name should stay suppressed.
After 90 minutes of legal argument, the three judges reserved their decision.
The appellant's lawyer, Christopher Wilkinson-Smith, said he had instructions to seek the recusal of Justice Helen Winkelmann, who, he said, had had "quite extensive involvement" as a High Court judge in his client's case.
The lawyer said he had been asked to raise the issue only 10 minutes before the hearing started.
Justices Ellen France and John Wild discussed the issue with Justice Winkelmann.
Justice Wild said the decision on recusal was one for his colleague herself.
He said she had mulled over the issue earlier.
"All three of us already thought about it. Justice Winkelmann declines to recuse herself," he said.
"We will include in our judgment reasons for that ... they are essentially that a judge's previous involvement in the case does not normally provide a basis or a ground for recusal."
Justice Wild said there was no evidence Justice Winkelmann would not be "objective" about the application for continued secrecy relating to the appellant's identity.
Mr Wilkinson-Smith said name suppression was necessary to protect the integrity of any future appeal against his client's sentence.
"Effectively he will apply for a retrial," he said.
The appellant could apply for that retrial only after he was sentenced. Sentencing was expected to happen in August.
Tania Goatley, of the law firm Bell Gully, appeared for media organisations opposed to name suppression.
She said the Criminal Procedure Act allowed the media to appeal against the suppression order.
"Suppression for offenders convicted of serious crimes is very rare," Ms Goatley added.
Kieran Raftery, for the Crown, said the "very murder of Mrs Gotingco was itself a newsworthy event". He also said any retrial was a "remote possibility" rather than a certainty.
Justice Wild ordered non-publication of some aspects and arguments of the name-suppression appeal. The judges said they hoped to release their decision soon.
Throughout the four-week trial, the media were allowed to publish images of the appellant's face but his name remained suppressed.
After the jury returned its verdicts in the High Court, Justice Timothy Brewer said there was no reason for the defendant's name suppression to continue.
'He has disregarded our voice and continued with this divisive kaupapa.'