The private investigator for the family of Mike Zhao-Beckenridge believes police did not investigate the disappearance of the boy and his stepfather, John Beckenridge, thoroughly enough.
Closing submissions in the Coroners Court case into the disappearance of the pair were heard on Monday after a three-week adjournment.
The coronial hearing in front of Coroner Marcus Elliot aims to establish whether the pair are dead or alive.
Police lawyer Deirdre Elsmore argued the pair died by murder-suicide when Beckenridge drove his vehicle off a cliff in the Catlins, Southland, in 2015.
“It’s important in this context to consider John Beckenridge’s personality, his relative dysfunction prior to the change in custody and the clear change in his personality that was witnessed by a number of witnesses.”
Beckenridge and his 11-year-old stepson vanished in March 2015.
His car was found at the bottom of a cliff in the Catlins two months later, but their bodies have never been found.
Elsmore referred to police conclusions that recovering bodies from this particular coastline was generally difficult.
“Beckenridge planned to ensure that it [the car] landed in the sea, he planned to ensure that the bodies would not be found.
“There’s no mystery, and there is a question mark in relation to this matter, as to why they were not found, but that it is not a mystery based on the evidence.”
But Mike Zhao-Beckenridge’s family believed there remained unanswered questions. His mother, Fiona Lu, believed the pair were still alive.
‘Dangerous’ to conclude pair deceased
The family’s private investigator, Mark Templeman, appearing via video link, said police evidence on the case was “insufficient”.
“John Beckenridge planned an escape from New Zealand for himself and Mike and this plan included the staging of their suicide at the Catlins.
“I submit that John knew before the Family Court hearing that he was likely to lose custody of Mike and that he and Mike agreed a plan to stage their deaths.”
In his submission, Templeman said there were doubts about the pair being in the vehicle when the car drove off the cliff and that police did not seek a “second opinion or independent review” on the evidence found at the crash scene.
Elsmore proposed a further independent review of police evidence be completed.
Templeman said it would be “dangerous” to conclude the pair were dead.