His letterbox had a sticker reading "No advertising material - please".
"But it's being over-honoured ... because we don't get the stuff we should have.
"We want the ability to stop the piles of advertising junk which come in, but at the same time be able to get our local community newsletters."
Debra Dunsford of the Milford Residents' Association agreed, saying that residents wanted their newsletters - in five years her group had never received a complaint about delivering its notices to marked letterboxes.
The planned bylaw was also criticised by the Marketing Association.
Spokesman Keith Norris said distributing unaddressed mail employs 9000 New Zealanders and revenue exceeds $80 million a year.
"Our preference is for no bylaw and council leaving it to the national code of practice," said Mr Norris.
"We agree that people shouldn't have junk mail if they don't want it."
He said that councils with similar bylaws since 2006 had not prosecuted anyone.
"Officers tell us they cannot enforce it. So what's changed?"
Former councils in the Auckland area have attempted to deal with junk mail.
Since 2006, North Shore and Waitakere City councils had a bylaw making it an offence to deposit unaddressed mail in three types of marked letterboxes, or to place them on parked vehicles.
The old Auckland City Council's bylaw referred to "clearly marked" letterboxes, or parked vehicles or into full letterboxes.
Neither Manukau, Papakura, Franklin nor Rodney had junk mail bans.
A spokeswoman for Auckland council yesterday said: "Delivery of unwanted material to mailboxes adds to the community's litter problem."
Q&A: The plan
What is affected?
Unaddressed mail.
What type?
Advertising material, clothing donation bags, circulars, leaflets, brochures or flyers.
Where does it apply?
Any letterbox marked "no circulars", "no junk mail", "addressed mail only".
What is exempt?
Subscribed newspapers, public notices and election material.