Taxation is never far away from the political debate.
The pros and cons of how much to tax, what's fair, what can be dodged and whether we're all being hoodwinked going into the election will continue.
It's where and the National and Labour protagonists, Steven Joyce and Grant Robertson, viciously lock horns trying to make each other look like monetary morons.
Bill English, who's essentially been pulling the public purse strings for the best past of a decade, has been doing his best to rattle the loquacious Jacinda Ardern, who for the most part's been hiding behind the taxation working group she's planning to set up after the election, if she gets the chance.
But she does herself a disservice by continuing to declare what's hot and what's not when it comes to tax, with her group's options being diminished by the day.
The latest tax to come off their drawing board's inheritance and that follows capital gains on the family home and the land that lies beneath it, even if the property's owned by a trust.
Possible increases to the top income tax rate were canned after the Government's books were opened, and even though she said it'd take days to analyse the figures on that one, it took a couple of hours.
Then there's the wishy washy water tax that's as popular as a wet, mouldy blanket down on the farm.
The more taxes she takes off the table, the greater the impression is that she knows exactly what she wants to do with the system and that creates the uncertainty.
But on the other side, National's claim we're being asked to elect a committee rather than a Government in 10 days time is a bit rich, given we did exactly the same with them if you accept that contention.
Their own taxation working group, like the Labour one will also do, got their heads together the year after they came to power.
