I often wonder how many Government department, ACC or Work and Income, or rest home decisions and actions would stand up to the scrutiny of court - if people had the resources, time and energy to challenge those decisions.
I believe it is true that a lot of what Work and Income do is saving people from themselves. People's circumstances can be the result of bad judgment - or even a couple of generations of bad judgment and bad genes - compounded by an inability to stop fathering or producing children.
We're in a society where it is the older generation who frequently have to step in. We see grandmothers raising their grandchildren, or great-nephews or nieces. We're also a society where we dump our elderly in rest homes and then secretly resent their temerity in living long enough to become a burden.
It is the mark of a civilised society where those who are less fortunate are provided protection. New Zealand is unique with ACC, but the concept of benefits, to ensure people don't literally starve, die is common in western society.
But there is an undercurrent of resentment among those who "have". Those who have made the "right" decisions, achieved the right education, and have followed strong moral values to make a reasonable success in life.