A crowd gathers outside the Auckland High Court as an urgent hearing takes place to decide the care of a baby whose parents refuse to use blood from vaccinated donors. Video / NZ Herald
Baby W made international headlines in December because his parents did not want him to have surgery if the blood productsneeded came from a Covid-vaccinated donor.
Anti-vaccination mandate protestors outside the Auckland High Court as the case was heard over the supply of blood to a four-month-old baby in Starship who requires urgent surgery. Photo / Alex Burton
Te Whatu Ora said apart from the costs of bringing in outside legal advice, it could not measure how much its internal legal team spent on the case.
The hospital stepped up security at the time of the case and the baby’s operation just a few days later.
However, it did not incur any extra costs because all the security guards were already employed by the hospital, it said.
In the hearing, Baby W’s parents had argued that they wanted him to have the surgery but not if it ran the risk of him being given blood from a vaccinated person.
But the hospital argued it was not possible to differentiate, that the blood from a vaccinated person was safe, and that it was not possible for the parents to choose their donor.
The judge said the parents were loving and wanted the best for their baby but his priority in making the decision was the baby and his health.
He gave the hospital doctors the power to make all medical decisions but left all other care in the hands of the parents.
