Manukau ward councillor Alf Filipaina says there is a lot of anxiety around the review and says any move to reduce representation would potentially leave local boards stretched and negatively affect the communities they serve.
“When you cut down numbers, you cut down the possibility of representation, especially from across ethnic groups,” says the veteran Pacific politician.
“When you cut down numbers, you’re slowly going back to the old councils, hypothetically you might get Manurewa and Papakura together and as a result of representation, what you will find … will be amalgamation.
“You will end up with boundaries the same size as the Far North, for example.”
Councillor Julia Fairey is leading the Joint Governance Working Party and says a review of the Super City’s structure, which came into being in 2010, is timely.
“Time is right for a review, [the] setting of boundaries. After 13 years, [it’s] time to kick the wheels and see if this model does work. Obviously there’s going to be a range of views at this table and we’re going to need to go back and forth with the governance board working party and indeed local boards before we finalise anything that can go out to the community for further consultation.”
The mayor is leading the move for change and also commented that he believed the governance body itself with 21 ward councillors was too large.
“There is an appetite, I’ve spoken to lots of local boards, they’re quite keen to move forward in some changing of various bits and pieces.”
Filipaina says it was only a matter of time before the mayor’s office trained its sights on the number of councillors as well.
“It’s shocking it’s happening … what he’s doing is dismantling democracy because it’ll move to councillors. We’re going to lose diversity, less people around the table will be from different ethnicities.”
He says common sense needed to prevail or else there was a risk representation would be less reflective of Auckland’s diverse communities.
“He’s just basically breaking down democracy, it’ll become a rich person’s game.”
Cr Richard Hill pressed the Mayor about the scope of the working party and the possibility it may come back recommending the status quo.
“Does that exclude the working party actually saying that we don’t want any re-organisation,” he asked Brown.”[Is it] sort of saying they have to develop plans or options for reorganisation? What if they come back and say they don’t want to do that?”
The mayor conceded no change was part of the scope but his earlier comments to the Governing Body showed he was highly motivated to make changes.
“I am determined to make changes, we will need a multi-pronged approach to prod [the] government into this.”
Filipaina says the public will likely play a role in what the council’s representative body would eventually look like depending on the recommendations from the Joint Governance Working Party.
In June, the Governing Body agreed that any changes to the local boards would be considered under the Local Government Act and for the council to evaluate the potential impact on boards, and to demonstrate whether there was strong community support for reorganisation.
The Joint Governance Working Party has also been tasked with determining whether the Governing Body should proceed further, including whether to undertake public consultation.