Would you please clarify the situation when what appears to be an uncontrolled T-intersection is not a T-intersection? Seaview Rd in Castor Bay, Auckland does not terminate but just takes a sharp left-hand turn and continues up the hill. The downhill side of the intersection, Marama St, appears to be part of the continuing major road, when in fact it terminates at that intersection, although there are no give way signs. Who has right of way, both uphill and downhill, and in which direction, in this situation? Fiona Downes.
I've looked at the street map, and it's a funny one. However, the new rules are quite clear. Because Marama St is the terminating road, all traffic on Marama must give way to vehicles on the continuing road, ie, Seaview Rd.
Who gives way at an intersection controlled by lights where right-turning traffic has a green arrow but the left-turning traffic has a free left turn, as is the case at the intersections of Richardson Rd/White Swan Rd, and St Lukes Rd/Morningside Drive? Right-turning traffic must have right of way because it has a green arrow but the free left-turning traffic under the new rule has right of way. Mark Rowe.
The Transport Agency website states that if all other give way rules (or signs or signals) do not determine who gives way, give way to vehicles coming from your right. Thus traffic with a free left turn must wait for right-turning vehicles with a green arrow.
Two cars are at a controlled intersection, both with give way signs, facing each other, and both want to turn right. Who gives way to whom? Shirley Nicol.
