According to the golf club’s president, Bruce Yates, the proposed road also lengthened the journey to reach the course by 2.5km.
“We felt it was totally ridiculous,” he told the Herald.
Yates and the club’s organisers had an alternative idea to where the road should be built - south of the course where the fairway wouldn’t be touched.
The only problem with this suggestion, Yates said, comes in the form of a 30m strip of wetland smack in the middle of where their road would run.
Ministry for the Environment rules introduced in 2020 heavily restricted the works that could be carried out in and near wetlands.
In order for the golf club to have its proposed road built and save its course, it would need to secure consent from Environment Canterbury.
Despite the road being the more expensive and complicated option, local councillors opted last week to explore the possibility of gaining consent.
But organisers aren’t out of the woods yet.
The council’s CEO, Hamish Dobbie, told Yates and the club that he would organise a pre-application meeting with the regional council - but hopes aren’t high.
“The council has had issues with [Environment Canterbury] in the past over other issues, they believe consenting to any works in a wetland is impossible,” said Yates.
Yates said the golf club spoke with an Environment Canterbury ecologist who believes a culvert could possibly be installed to protect the wetland and secure consent.
The alternative, Yates said, is seeing their course and business impacted.
“You can’t have a 16-hole golf course, we’ve got a beautiful course and it’s a great place to come to,” he said.
“Close to 4000 people come here, being close to Christchurch, because they’re virtually guaranteed a free game - so that’s the scale of risk we face.”
A council report from August comparing the two options highlighted the consent problems with the golf club’s preferred option.
“There will potentially have to be consideration of multiple plans and legal instruments,” the report, authored by Dobbie, said.
However, Hurunui District councillor Garry Jackson told the Herald the percentage chance of gaining consent is not zero.
“None of us are using the word impossible,” he said.
“We understand it’s more complex and time-consuming, but nobody is rejecting this option just because of consent. We agree the issues need to be investigated further before we make a final call.”