The woman is under cross-examination by Ward's lawyer Anthony Rogers, on the fourth day of the trial.
Rogers asked the woman if she was "blaming" Ward for other problems in her life.
He asked if her performance in the Navy and her academic efforts were poor.
She did not agree.
The woman reported the alleged attack to police in 2014 after she went to see a counsellor and realised the unresolved issue still affected her.
Rogers asked why she did not report the assault earlier.
"I was really scared, I was scared what would happen to me."
Rogers asked her why then she was able to make other complaints about other colleagues.
The woman agreed she made complaints about three other people.
"If it was such a concern to you not to make waves as far as your career was concerned, why was it that you had no qualms about making complaints relating to bullying and harassment?"
The woman replied: "When you're told that women should be barefoot and pregnant in front of a stove instead of driving ships, I don't think that's right."
Her experience with Ward made her "more sensitive to sexist remarks and harassment and the bullying", she said.
Before the attack, the woman alleges Ward made inappropriate and uninvited intimate contact with her.
Yesterday she said Ward would stand unnecessarily close to her while they were carrying out duties.
The woman said this happened about four times, usually after dark when others were not around.
He would brush his arm against hers, and when he walked past her he would brush his crotch against her bottom, she alleged.
Rogers also asked about the ship's log.
He suggested that Ward was not on the same duties as the woman, and asked her if the contact was accidental.
She disagreed, and said the log's entries were not signed so were not reliable.
The trial continues.