Mr Brown said the trees were a symbol of a more "united city" that had moved beyond the grievances of the past.
"This is against the backdrop of the resolution of most of the iwi grievances...we are able to see the resolution of those settlements by and large in place."
However Mr Smith said while politicians might believe these trees symbolised hopes of a "new dawn", the life for many Maori were not so rosy.
"I find it difficult to believe as social indicators show there are growing levels of social inequality."
He said the many deals politicians spoke of were just "political spin" and that there were still massive levels of discontent among certain iwi.
Mr Smith wasn't opposed to the planting and understood the emotional resonance many had with having trees on top of One Tree Hill.
But he said it was all part of a "political illusion".
Given his interest in climate change Mr Smith didn't have faith the trees would even withstand the changing environment.
"It's futile to be planting these given the set of circumstances," he said. "If council is serious it's better they challenge the fossil fuel agenda...it's the only way these trees will have a chance of survival."
Trees have long had a chequered history atop the mount. Settlers reportedly cut down the first native tree at the summit in the 1850s.
Sir John Logan Campbell replanted a grove of totara and pine trees in the 1870s but only one Monterey pine at the summit survived.
In 1994, Mr Smith took a chainsaw to the pine out of frustration over the Government limiting Maori Treaty settlements to $1 billion.
He was arrested for "interfering with a tree without resource consent" and convicted and sentenced to nine month's periodic detention.
Relatives of Mr Smith then attacked the tree with a chainsaw in 1999.
He neither confirmed nor denied any future protest action at the summit.
However he said protest was part and parcel of the democratic society that we live in.
"I will continue to take part in non-violent direct action."