Walters, for his part, said he was partially deaf and had to play the TV loudly.
He also said he never knew his loud viewing habits were a problem until the police showed up on his door.
He said he couldn't "understand why it was he who was taken away by the police and not the neighbour".
However, adjudicator Robson dismissed Walters' claims about not knowing his loud TV watching was a problem, saying he had been handed a letter directly into his hand warning him about it and other anti-social behaviour.
A Mr Hollebon - acting on behalf of the landlord - told the Tribunal hearing held via a phone call during the alert level 4 lockdown that there was a long history of Walters' anti-social behaviour.
Most affected were the tenants living in a flat that adjoined Walters'.
Two previous tenants had lasted just two and six months, respectively, in the adjoining flat before moving out because of the noise of his TV.
Hollebon said that - since the most recent tenant moved into the adjoining flat in January - they had sent him 165 texts and phone calls complaining about Walters' noise and threatening behaviour.
"Noise control has been called on a number of occasions and after such visits
the noise increases, not decreases, as has Mr Walters' confrontational and
aggressive behaviour towards the neighbouring tenant," Hollebon told the tribunal.
In February, Hollebon said he was working at a separate unit when he saw Walters "leap the fence" to get in the faces of his neighbours.
Hollebon rushed over to "trespass" Walters from the property, telling him it was unacceptable and later delivering a letter as notice of this, he said.
In March, the whole "neighbourhood" was affected by Walters' TV and police were called. After they visited, Walters turned the tube up not down, Hollebon said.
The police were then called on Walters two times in the next five days, the last occasion because he was threatening to beat his neighbour's head in with a stick, leaving her hiding from him, Hollebon said.
Walters denied the accusation.
Following the list of complaints, the landlord applied to evict Walters.
Adjudicator Robson warned Walters to change his behaviour.
She said Hollebon had suggested Walters use headphones or move his TV to the other side of the room and backed these suggestions as ways to deal with his partial deafness.
She also dismissed claims Walters didn't know he was causing problems to neighbours.
Despite this, she refused to evict Walters.
She told Hollebon to instead wait 21 days. If Walters committed further anti-social acts during that period Hollebon could alert Tenancy Services and the matter would be further considered.
"If that was to be the case it is very likely Mr Walters' tenancy would be terminated immediately," Robson said.
She said Walters had told her he had no family and nowhere to move to during the lockdown and that she needed to consider that.