Stop buying antibacterial soap.
While I think it's ridiculous to demonise food additives because their names are long, or to market products as being "chemical free" (nothing is chemical free) there are a couple products I feel comfortable vilifying, from a scientific standpoint. And soaps that use triclosan are at the top of the list.
At face value, the promise of "antibacterial" soaps seems squeaky clean: Fewer bacteria means less chance of illness, right? Germs are gross.
Even if you buy into that - which you shouldn't, because most of the bacteria you interact with are awesome - triclosan is not the best. It's bad at its job and potentially bad for you, too.
A new study in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy found that, under normal hand washing conditions, antibacterial soap wasn't any better at killing germs than regular soap. That's actually not news: In 2014, an analysis of all the available literature on triclosan concluded the exact same thing.