A blood-sucking, disease-spreading, whining creature is always going to be a hard sell, even to nature lovers. And the dreaded mosquito is now the prime suspect behind the sudden arrival and explosive spread of Zika virus. Zika is transmitted by a mosquito vector Aedes aegypti, a pan-global tropical species already well known for spreading diseases such as yellow and dengue fever.
There are only around 3,500 species of mosquito, which is modest for a family of insects - but their impact on human health and welfare is catastrophic. Female Anopheles mosquitoes carry the parasite that causes up to 500m cases of malaria a year while the Asian Tiger Mosquito, Ades albopictus, spreads dengue fever and the chikugunya virus. Mosquitoes have been ready vectors for emergent diseases such as West Nile virus and now Zika.
Mosquitoes are credited with causing more misery and loss to humanity than any other organism (with the obvious exception of ourselves). Mosquitoes are unlovely creatures, all twitchy legged and whining, their larvae infesting miasmas and dismal swamps. And under the right conditions they are mobile and expansionist pioneers, perfectly at home in the disrupted habitats we create.
Which begs the question: what good do they do - and if we could wipe them from the face of the Earth should we?
As pointed out by ecologist Sarah Fang, the consensus is that mosquitoes do not do any unique or particular good that would be missed. If you judge them according to ecologist Charles Elton's gentle but evocative idea of each creature having a niche - much as every English village has a cast of characters who have their place such as butcher, baker and policeman - then mosquitoes seem to have no special purpose on the face of it. So one wouldn't miss them, surely?