My highs and lows with baby tech may not be every parent’s experience. But the lessons I learned from my misadventures, from internet-controlled night lights to nanny cams, should be universally applicable.
Here’s what to know.
Upgrading knowledge triumphs over fancy gizmos, including Snoo
When our daughter was first born, she snoozed effortlessly in a no-frills bassinet I bought from another parent through Facebook Marketplace. But when she turned about 3 months old, she began loudly protesting naps. That made me consider the Snoo, the chicly designed white bassinet that automatically sways and plays sounds to soothe a fussy baby.
Among parents, the Snoo is a polarising product not just because of its price (US$1,700 [$2950]). Several of my friends with the privilege of owning one called the device a godsend that saved them from the brink of insanity. Others said their child hated it. I had read the book about soothing newborns written by the Snoo’s creator, Harvey Karp, so I wanted to give it a shot.
Fortunately, a friend lent me a Snoo. I downloaded a US$20 ($35) companion app and paid a subscription for access to some of its extra perks, including a rocking motion that mimicked the bumps and jostles of riding in a car.
My baby was initially unfazed when we strapped her in. But when she started crying and the bassinet reacted by swaying and playing white noise, she cried even louder. After a few weeks of experimenting, we reverted to her old-school bassinet.
A spokesperson for Happiest Baby, the company behind Snoo, said it was ideal to acclimatise babies to the product as soon as they were born because it simulates the movements and sounds a baby experiences inside a mother’s womb. However, the company advertises Snoo as suitable for babies up to 6 months of age, and my daughter fit this criterion.
The tech that eventually helped? E-books.
One late night, I downloaded a US$14 ($24) ebook by a paediatrician about infant psychology and sleep. I began to understand why my 3-month-old was fighting sleep and how to anticipate when she would need a nap. We tried the book’s methods, and within a few weeks my baby began napping regularly and sleeping through the night.
Knowledge is more powerful – and cheaper to access – than a fancy bassinet.
The best tech is those that help parents with broken brains
My wife and I found the most useful baby tech to be smartphone apps that helped us process information in our sleep-deprived state. The free app Huckleberry, a tool for parents to log bottle feedings, nappy changes and sleep durations for their babies, was crucial for my wife and me to communicate the baby’s needs with each other when we took turns working shifts. It also provided useful data for our paediatrician.
Also helpful was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s free Milestones app, which shows a checklist of a child’s expected developmental milestones at each age, such as learning to roll at 6 months.
When she was about 7 months old, our daughter began to crawl. We could no longer take our eyes off her, so we shifted to consuming more parenting literature through a different medium: audiobooks.
Single-task baby tech is unnecessary
Lots of popular baby tech are gadgets that serve a single purpose.
The US$60 ($105) Hatch Rest, a night light that plays white noise, is a product on many parents’ lists of must-haves for helping babies sleep. The US$250 ($435) Nanit Pro, a webcam that can alert you to a baby’s movements and cries, is another. So is the US$50 ($87) Philips Avent electronic bottle warmer, which heats up a bottle of refrigerated milk with the press of a button in a few minutes.
I received all of those products as gifts through our registry. Though I liked using them, I ultimately realised other products I already owned could accomplish the same tasks.
- The Nanit Webcam had an impressive set of features for monitoring our baby, including a tool that automatically detected what time I put her to bed and what time she woke up. But that feature required the camera to be mounted on a tall tripod against a wall to get a bird’s-eye view of the cot, which was unfeasible with the layout of our bedroom. We used the Nanit just like any webcam for periodically checking on the video feed of our child in her cot. That could also be done with any general-purpose security camera, like the US$100 ($173) indoor Nest Cam.
- Our baby slept better in pitch dark, so the Hatch Rest, the colours of which can be changed through a smartphone app, proved unhelpful. (Maybe when our daughter is older she will appreciate that the light can be set on a timer so it illuminates when it’s time for her to wake up.) We used only the feature for playing white noise. When we travelled, we used a tablet or smartphone to play white noise in the hotel room, making a dedicated sound machine superfluous.
- The Philips Avent bottle warmer initially it seemed useful, but every caregiver for our daughter, including relatives, my wife, myself and now our nanny, stopped using it. We each independently realised that a metal coffee mug partly filled with hot water from the sink was faster.
This is not to say that any of the aforementioned products won’t work well for another parent. But the problem with the premise of the best baby gear is that it requires any two infants to be alike, which is rarely the case.
It’s best to get to know your baby before starting a list, rather than the other way around.This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Brian X. Chen©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES