There's a Tui billboard in Clive, Hawke's Bay, that reads: "There's a second wave of hotties at 2am. Yeah right." It would be nice to think that perhaps they're referring to a luxury lodge that delivers fresh hot water bottles to guests in the early hours of the morning. But more likely it's a reference to so called "beer goggles" - defined by urbandictionary.com as a "phenomenon in which one's consumption of alcohol makes physically unattractive persons appear beautiful."
So the left-hand side of the billboard is saying that even the ugly chicks will look hot if you stay out late enough and drink enough beer. Since when is the denigration of women an acceptable part of any respectable brand's marketing campaign? Tui billboards may be famous for being edgy but surely this one is a step too far, a tad too misogynistic.
Is that why it's buried in the township of Clive, population 1500 in 2006? Do the advertising people dare not place it in a high profile spot near an Auckland motorway where it is likely to inspire the ire of urban feminists and activists in general? Yet I suspect that a brand of beer that has been "distracting the boys from the task at hand since 1889" would consider offending feminists a desirable component of any campaign.
Tui - which targeted this group with the billboard that read: "Having a beer with the Auckland feminist group would be fun. Yeah right." - has also offended other niche groups including:
* Redheads with "Santa even likes ginger kids. Yeah right." (Evidently this one was installed in error.)