I didn't have enough money to pay for my spontaneous grocery shop on Sunday. My daughter and I had been out at a sporting event all day and on the way home we took a detour to the supermarket. Without my wallet, I had just $55 cash to my name. I knew it would be tight and by the time everything was scanned, our shopping totalled $68. My daughter handed over the $4 she had in her pocket but we were still short. Something would have to go.
The latest New Idea magazine was the first casualty. (I'd only bought it to read Jesse Mulligan's column which I thought was about naming his new daughter. I would have to remain uninformed about that.) But the total was still over $60.
I peered into the packed bags to see what would be jettisoned next. It was a really difficult decision; I'd just chosen everything because we either needed or wanted it. My daughter had a $6 magazine which ostensibly should have been the first to go. But picking on the one item she'd chosen just seemed mean-spirited - especially since I wasn't foregoing the hot-off-the-press issue of Metro magazine or the Herald on Sunday.
So I returned a small banana-flavoured milk-drink to the operator. She scanned it and the total came down but not enough. I went through the bags once more. If I sent back the hummus then I had no need for the pita bread. If I sent back the pasta sauce then there was no point in buying the pesto-and-ricotta-filled ravioli.
I spied a bunch of five bananas. "Could I give you a couple of those back?" I asked the operator. She weighed them, removed two and returned the rest to me. "There you go," she said, indicating a new, reduced total of $59.43. "But I've only got $59," I said. After checking with a colleague, the operator kindly let me off the 43 cents.
I'd never had to edit my supermarket shop to fit available funds before but I know that it's a problem many people face. And I know not everyone has current affairs magazines and ready-stuffed pasta in their trolley when it happens.