When my daughter was in Year Five iPads were recommended items for this cohort of students. (These devices were being phased in over time at the school so my daughter's year was, I think, the last one before such items were compulsory.)
I'd always known that laptops were required in Year Seven and this seemed fine to me but furnishing primary-school-aged children with iPads was a new proposition. I've always thought that iPads fill quite a strange niche in the world of technological devices. In my mind, they're not serious or robust enough to take the place of a laptop or desktop computer for working purposes and they don't have the nimbleness or compactness of an iPhone.
However, they are ideally suited to people like my mother who by the age of 70 had not once touched a computer and had an "I don't type" attitude towards keyboards. Her newly acquired iPad allows her to see digital photos of her grandchildren that she had previously been missing out on. And, best of all, no "typing" is required. The iPad is the perfect solution for the reluctant "digital immigrant".
But an iPad for a tech-savvy nine-year-old struck me as quite a different notion. As a parent I wanted to keep my child off computers at home for as long as possible. It doesn't take an overly active imagination to wonder if people of her generation will all have RSI before they're forty as a result of their early and lifelong attachment to the screen and keyboard.