Freshly hyphenated surnames seem to be on the rise. Sometimes a woman takes on two standalone surnames linked by a hyphen after marriage. Sometimes both the husband and wife adopt this new egalitarian handle. Other times, usually if the mother and father have different surnames, the hyphenated name is given to the children.
Back in 2001, in a piece (Like father, like son and daughter) that questioned the tradition of giving children the father's surname, I also criticised hyphenated surnames: "[H]yphenation is irresolute and short-sighted .... Often the two surnames don't sit that well together." Futhermore, "[u]nder this scenario, within a couple of generations children would have eight-barrelled surnames and their offspring [would have] 16 names to remember."
It might be the ultimate in fairness and it might be a body blow to sexism and inequality but hyphenating two surnames just doesn't seem like a viable long-term strategy. A blog entry entitled Stop Complaining About My Kid's Hyphenated Last Name reveals the myriad "little daily dramas of carrying two names".
The writer says that such a move elicited questions from perplexed friends and her son was the only child at his day-care with a double-barrelled name: "My child might have to squeeze his name into too-few boxes on a form or the last three letters may get dropped over and over again on printouts ... He will definitely have to spell and repeat and sound out and explain."
There are other reasons to regard a hyphenated surname with suspicion. Unless the two individual family names are especially compatible, the new name is often clumsy and cumbersome. Recently invented hyphenated names don't usually roll smoothly off the tongue.
Additionally, some people detect a degree of artifice associated with some double-barrelled names, a sense that they are manufactured, untested and somewhat false. Two perfectly good and functional surnames can be turned into one unsympathetic double-barrelled version with the addition of just an innocent dash.