If a 15-year French study can discover that even the humble bra is a "false necessity", it's only a short leap to wonder if the maternity wear industry is similarly kept alive by flawed assumptions and a reliance on the principles of wants rather than needs. I've long suspected that the brands and stores specialising in clothing created to accommodate baby bumps represent little more than opportunistic attempts to part women from their money at a vulnerable time of their lives.
Dedicated pregnancy wear includes tunics, ponchos, swinging shirts, floating tops - and dresses that swirl and wrap. But when it comes to maternity swimwear and hosiery you have to wonder if the designers are having a laugh. Aren't togs by definition already stretchy?
I know that my existing (non-pregnancy) swimwear managed to accommodate my baby bump - as did my regular tennis skirts which conveniently contained up to 14 per cent Spandex and therefore had impressive powers of expansion. Similarly, I wore a lot of those long, finely-meshed, stretchy tops that were all the rage ten years ago; they fitted perfectly over my growing bump.
I made only two specific purchases for very late pregnancy: one was a long, black fishtail-type of skirt two sizes larger than my normal size and the other was a long blue denim maternity skirt with an adjustable elastic waistband secured by buttons at each side. Of the two items, I liked the black skirt far better. It felt like a mainstream fashion item rather than a frumpy piece of purpose-built equipment with an integrated expanding waist system as seen on clothes for toddlers.
Obviously all women are different. In some pregnancies, bellies start expanding from day one making maternity wear appealing from very early on. But other bellies take their sweet time to grow and these mothers-in-waiting are able to wear their regular clothes until those last couple of months of pregnancy.