The subject of platonic relationships between members of the opposite gender is fascinating but not everyone believes in the idea that a man and a woman can share a friendship devoid of any sexual attraction or chemistry.
I wouldn't say I'm a platonic-relationship-denier but I'm definitely a bit of a sceptic. It may not be a very modern or sophisticated thing to admit but I view platonic relationships in much the same way as I do the Loch Ness Monster: they're a nice thought and lots of people are adamant they've had firsthand sightings of them but I'm not totally convinced they exist.
My own personal history is surely to blame. I had two brief friendships with men when I was eighteen and neither of them survived past the first coffee-date before the guys made it clear they had other aims in mind. And in my twenties a man became my constant companion at a time I was experiencing extreme emotional difficulties. I considered the relationship purely platonic although my friends, family and shrink were convinced I was blithely missing all the signals.
Platonic relationships were the focus of my Canvas article entitled Friends without benefits. Two of the women - one of whom described her encounter with a flatmate as having "screwed the crew" - I interviewed confessed to becoming romantically involved with a platonic friend of the opposite gender.
It seems that platonic friendships come with a degree of danger. Relationship experts warn people to "set boundaries", avoid "blurring the lines" and not to become too touchy-feely with the other person, lest the wrong signals be sent. In fact, a survey of more than 1450 members of dating site match.com found that 62 per cent had crossed the line from platonic friendship to a romantic or sexual encounter.