Kiwi photographer who handled damning Prince Andrew and Virgina Giuffre image speaks out

Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell in the infamous photo which has been branded a fake. Photo / US District Court - Southern District of New York

Claims a photo of Prince Andrew with his arm around Virginia Giuffre is a “fake” have been branded “ridiculous” by the Kiwi photographer who handled the original image.

Michael Thomas, now based in Arrowtown after working for the Mail on Sunday in the UK, has recounted his dealings with the image following several attempts to discredit its authenticity.

Last week, Ghislaine Maxwell - who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and grooming underage girls for late billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein - again cast doubt on the authenticity of the picture, while the Duke of York also previously insisted he didn’t remember the photo being taken and declared he was “not one to hug” or “display affection” in public.

Giuffre - who sued the royal for alleged sexual assault after being trafficked by Epstein as a teenager - insisted the photo was “authentic” and she had given the FBI the original in 2011.

Prince Andrew has previously said of the image he didn’t remember it being taken and declared he was “not one to hug” or “display affection” in public. Photo / Getty Images

Now, Thomas - who took 39 copies of the image before it was handed over to the FBI - has blasted theories surrounding the photo.

It is understood Giuffre first showed the photo - which she claimed was taken the night she had sex with the prince at the bidding of Maxwell and Epstein - to Thomas, then photographer for Mail on Sunday reporter Sharon Churcher in February 2011.

As is standard practice when handling sensitive images, she allowed Thomas to take photographs of the original print - the whereabouts of which is currently unknown - and he took dozens of the front and the back.

He recalled to the Mail on Sunday: “She handed me the photograph and I put it on the table in the hotel room and I copied it.

“I think I took more than 30 frames, which is overkill for copying one photo but I didn’t want to get it out of focus or get it wrong because I knew how important it was.

“I was holding the original photo in my hand. It was a normal 6x4 inch print that you would have got from any developer at the time.

“It looked like it was 10 years old. It wasn’t crisp because it had been developed in 2001. She had held on to it for 10 years by the time I saw it. For Ghislaine Maxwell to come out and say it was fake is ridiculous. I held the photo. It was a normal photograph. It was a physical print. It exists. I saw it and that’s what I photographed and that’s what you see now ...

“When they say it’s fake, they are saying that I’m involved. They are basically accusing someone of faking it and me being party to it. It’s not fake – and it never has been.”

The back of the photo, which has never publicly been seen before, shows a stamp that reads “000 #15 13Mar01 Walgreens One Hour Photo.”

The information means the picture was developed in a one-hour service on March 13, 2001, at a branch of Walgreens, a pharmacy and photo-developing chain.

Meanwhile, amid reports the duke is planning to attempt to have his undisclosed settlement to Giuffre overturned, Maxwell’s family have spoken out in support.

Sex traffickers Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell is the focus of a new true-crime doco on Netflix. Photo / Netflix

While Giuffre has alleged she and the disgraced duke had sex in the bath at Maxwell’s house in London, her relatives insisted that it would be too small for them to have engaged in any sexual activity and even created a mock reconstruction - featuring two people approximately the size of the prince and his accuser - in the tub and shared its dimensions, 1359mm by 380mm.

Maxwell’s brother, Ian Maxwell, said: “If anything Andrew is a bit bigger, a bit broader than the man in the bath in the photo. You can see how small the bathroom is and how small the bath is. The idea that two people can get in there and she bats her eyes and takes her clothes off and has sex in the bath is impossible.

“The only way you can start to change public perception around that is to provide incontrovertible visual evidence. People can now look at this photo in the bath and judge for themselves. I am putting it out, and if that helps Prince Andrew then so be it. If Prince Andrew wants to use it, we will make it available to him.”