At this time of year, lots of us get all fired up and embark on new exercise regimes. New gym memberships spike; the streets are full of new runners and walkers, and we have visions of ourselves a few months down the track: fitter, slimmer versions of who we are now.
Aiming to move our bodies more and improve fitness is great. The benefits of exercise are well documented; exercise can lower our risk for many diseases and can positively affect everything from our gut bacteria to our sleep to our mental health. Moving is amazing for our health, and the more we do - and the more varied types of movement we can do - the better.
It's even more important as we age. We lose muscle mass and, typically, gain body fat over time, so keeping moving as we get older, and especially with resistance-type exercise, is super important if we want to stay strong and control our weight better in middle age.
But it's in the area of weight where we can over-estimate how much benefit exercise is going to have. We know the basic 'energy in vs. energy out' theory (although it's a bit more complex than that) but we tend to believe that if we just add in a few workouts, we'll lose weight.
This view is reinforced by Biggest Loser-style TV shows, which appear to show contestants training like maniacs but hardly touch on what they're eating. And we see it in magazines and social media with workouts and exercise plans promoted with incredible before and after shots, suggesting whatever gut-busting workout being sold (and it's almost always being sold) is responsible for the dramatic makeover.