It's been a noisy year in the world of nutrition. Niki Bezzant rounds up the good, the bad and the controversial.
Sugar sugar
Sugar has been a hot topic for a couple of years, but early this year the need to reduce our sugar intake had heavyweight backing from the World Health Organisation, when it released its sugar recommendations.
The WHO says we should reduce our daily intake of free sugars to less than 10 per cent of our total energy intake. Reducing to below 5 per cent - roughly 25g (6tsp) a day - would, it says, provide additional health benefits. Free sugars, incidentally, are the white stuff - as well as fruit juice, fruit puree, syrups and honey, and "healthy" sugars like coconut sugar, too. This doesn't mean we have to give up all sweet things, but it does mean being careful. Eating a healthy plant-based diet and keeping an eye on the sugar in packaged foods will leave room for an occasional treat.
Paleo goes big
It's been brewing for a while, but this has felt like the year of paleo everything, from recipe books to pet food. Australian chef Pete Evans has led the charge of the paleo diet into the mainstream, attracting fans and criticism. Others have jumped on that wagon, leading to an interesting array of paleo-friendly products on our shelves. I like some of the paleo cereals and breads, even if I dislike the name, and would find it difficult to justify the cost on a regular basis. Some paleo-friendly treats - raw slices, cake mix, chocolate - are unlikely to be any better than non-paleo equivalents. It will be interesting to see where this trend goes. According to Nielsen data, about 1.5 per cent of Kiwis say they eat paleo, about the same as those who follow a halal diet, which goes to show that sometimes the attention things get is out of step with the reality.
Health bloggers get in trouble
Online wellness warriors came to the fore this year. These days it seems anyone with a story of "it worked for me" can be the dispenser of nutrition advice.