My new boyfriend always eats and drinks way more than me when we dine out. I am usually happy to split the bill but in this case I feel like I'm always out of pocket. Am I just being tight? I can't afford to keep eating like this. - Scared of the Stinge, Auckland.
Judging by the fact you're still "splitting the bill" (and not taking turns paying for each other) we can only assume you're still in the early stages of this relationship. In which case, you're in luck. Your precedent hasn't yet become habit, so it'll be easier to change.
DO YOU HAVE A MODERN DAY DILEMMA OR STUCK IN AN ETHICAL BIND? SEND US AN EMAIL
You're not being stingy. What you're feeling is your boyfriend's lack of awareness of the situation, which you're internalising as taking advantage. There are two ways to go around this. You could either take your relationship to the next level and incorporate the aforementioned "I'll get it this time, you get it next time" philosophy to eating out. If you have a general agreement that whomever pays gets to choose the venue, you can be diligent by selecting restaurants at which you know you can manage the bill (pre-read the menus online so you know prices).
However, this slightly-subversive (though not unethical) workaround might still leave you with a large bill whenever your boyfriend decides to order two fillet steaks, while all you're having is a chopped salad. So, to solve the problem, hit it head on. Have a discussion about spending with your boyfriend, but don't do it while you're at a restaurant. Take the conversation into the daylight, and tell him splitting the bill is becoming really tough on you financially, and you want to open the option of an alternative solution. Your first hurdle - acknowledgement by both parties - is then jumped.