Melania Trump entering the White House Rose Garden to deliver her Republican National Convention speech. Photo / Doug Mills, The New York Times
Melania Trump entering the White House Rose Garden to deliver her Republican National Convention speech. Photo / Doug Mills, The New York Times
The first lady's words during her speech at the Republican National Convention said one thing, but her suit said another.
On the second night of the Republican National Convention, Melania Trump came dressed for battle.
She strode alone down the white-pillared colonnade of the White House on the long walkto the podium in an olive green skirt suit with broad shoulders and a military edge, exactingly tailored, caught at the waist with a wide belt and brass buttons. It was a far cry from the usual first lady convention garb, most often a dress or more lunchable suit, chosen with purpose to soften the image of the candidate and, by extension, help frame his — or her — more domestic side.
It was a far cry, for example, from the white dress with belled sleeves that Trump herself had chosen for her speech at the 2016 Republican Convention; a step away from the full-skirted green coatdress that Dr. Jill Biden wore in her appearance last week; even more removed from the pink and silver sleeveless brocade dress that sent the internet aflame when Michelle Obama wore it in 2012.
It was unusual enough, in this context, to demand attention before Trump even opened her mouth Tuesday evening.
On seeing the suit, which called to mind the situation room rather then the newly redone Rose Garden where Trump appeared (although that design, too, clearly prioritises control), viewers could have been forgiven for thinking that, like most of the speakers thus far, Trump was about to launch yet another verbal attack on — well, pick your target.
Tiffany Trump, speaking at the convention. Photo / Pete Marovich, The New York Times
She could — like Tiffany Trump, the president's fourth child, who chose a cocktail-ready Tiffany-blue pantsuit with flared trousers slit up to the knee — have gone after the media, and the campus thought police. "Why are so many in the media, in technology, even in our own government, so invested in promoting a biased and fabricated view?" she said. "Ask yourselves why are we prevented from seeing certain information?"
She could, like Eric Trump, the president's second son, who wore some beard scruff to match his brother's and spouted rhetoric and a bright blue tie with a big knot to match his father's, have gone after Joe Biden and the Democrats, whom he said "want to destroy the monuments of our forefathers" and "burn the Stars and Stripes that represent patriotism and the American dream."
Eric Trump has his tie adjusted by the stage manager before delivering remarks at the convention. Photo / Pete Marovich, The New York Times
Instead — and in front of a live (albeit small) audience — she addressed, more than any other Republican speaker thus far, the pain and confusion of the American electorate in the current pandemic. She called it Covid-19, not "the China virus." She spoke of healing, and mistakes, and the strength of anonymous people she had met as first lady. She thanked the front line workers, and her parents. She raised the opioid crisis and social media bullying (which in turn raised some eyebrows, given the bully in chief sitting in the front row). She did it all in a calm, and sincere voice, if with a relatively expressionless face.
When the coronavirus pandemic began, there was discussion about the fact that Donald Trump wanted to position himself as a wartime president. Recently, that idea seems to have been abandoned — most speakers during the first two nights of the convention have treated the current crisis as if it is over. Though not, apparently, Melania Trump.
So it was hard not to wonder, given the contrast between her words and what she was wearing: What war, exactly, was she fighting?
Was she declaring a truce or waging an entirely different skirmish of her own — one directed at changing the tenor of her husband's campaign? What territory was she protecting? Was she armouring herself against the watching world or someone closer to home?
Trump's white dress for her 2016 convention speech was a very different style from this year's choice. Photo / Chang W. Lee, The New York Times
Melania Trump makes so few appearances, and reveals so little of herself when she does, it is impossible to know. That's partly why her fashion choices have been read like wearable tea leaves. After all, as a former model, there is little doubt she makes such decisions with deliberation.
And it is why such questions have circled the first lady since her husband took office, sparking the Free Melania movement way back in the early days of the Trump administration. Even though the recent book by Mary Jordan, The Art of Her Deal, suggests that the third Mrs. Trump has always known what she was doing and has been a force in the marriage.
When she was done, after a standing ovation, her husband kissed her cheeks, and they walked hand-in-hand back to the residence, a united front. At least, that's the way it looked from the back, on-screen.
And besides, in one way at least, her suit was completely in line with the tenor of the event. It was by Alexander McQueen — a British brand, owned by a French conglomerate — and made in Italy, not America.
In an evening of stretching convention norms, thanks to appearances by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and a video of the president conducting a naturalisation ceremony in the White House, that fit right in.
