Since the last major review of mental health in the late 90s, dubbed the "Mason Report", mental health services have largely been the focus of secondary services, via the District Health Boards (DHBs). Primary, or community services, which have been a patchwork of charitable services such as Youthline, Lifeline and others, or private practice. There have been some attempts to fund access to psychological support via GPs, but these haven't been nationally - or even regionally - consistent. NGOs have, over the last decade grown in the gap, but with short contracts and competition for funding they have done the best with what little they have been able to get.
The Wellbeing Budget has turned this on its head, by committing nearly half a billion dollars to primary mental health care over the next five years. In doing so, they have provided much needed direction and commitment. It will also enable people to commit to train, or retrain, as we will need to grow the workforce to provide services at this level. By 2023/ 2024 it's projected this will allow around 325,000 Kiwis to access free, easily accessible mental health support.
By placing the service in "primary" health care - GP's clinics, community services and Kaupapa Māori providers - hopefully it will be much clearer how to access help, and where to go to get it.
Some of course have expressed concern about the level of DHB funding, and it's not clear yet how much is "enough", at least with regards to DHB mental health services. But the good news is we are now explicitly talking about a "ring-fence" - meaning a specific amount of money that has to be allocated to mental health services by DHBs as part of their funding.
There is of course more money for suicide prevention - although we are still without a plan - and attempts to address the pressures on staff responding to acute mental distress in emergency departments and increased funding across the board for addiction services.
And of course, more access to support earlier should, at least in theory, take pressure off acute mental health services.
So is $1.9 billion impressive? Yes.
Is it transformational? That remains to be seen.
But at last we now have a plan. And more importantly a clear commitment to listen to the needs and concerns of advocates, professionals, clients and the public.
Let's hope in five years time we all can look back and see that this is where the transformation started.