Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is said to have hated the character of Sherlock Holmes, which he first created for a short story in 1886. Conan Doyle was far prouder of his historical novels and once dismissed the detective stories as "an elementary form of fiction".
"I must save my mind for better things," he told his mother in a letter shortly before he tried - unsuccessfully - to kill off the enigmatic Baker Street sleuth in 1893.
Would Conan Doyle have been happy that the guardians of his estate have revived Holmes for one last adventure, 84 years after his last Holmes story was published? Possibly not.
But would he have approved of the result of the project, English writer Anthony Horowitz's novel, The House of Silk? Possibly.
I'm a third of the way through The House of Silk - one of our two feature reads for this month - and so far it's got all the elements of classic Sherlock Holmes: shady characters, twisty plotting, feats (and sometimes leaps) of deduction, fog...