Last week I wrote about the way in which male partners in law firms are repeatedly told they're the bees-knees and how this contributes to the "have her lotioned up and brought to my tent" attitude to young women.
Now I am 50 I wonder whether I have colluded in letting those men think they are entitled to fawning attention from young women. Because when I was younger, I certainly used to give it to them, flutter flutter, cringe.
I can see now I was really a bit of an enabler. By that I meanI adulated older men and thus let them think they could carry on behaving in a way which now seems not charmingly retro, but icky. When I went to Showgirls as the only woman in a group of older male colleagues I simply felt chuffed they invited me. (I do remember feeling a little overdressed, and the next morning thinking: Shit, I didn't get inspired to get up on the pole too, did I? Did I?)
Oh but before I go any further, may I object to the way the profession keeps framing this by saying it failed to "protect" the young women who were summer clerks? If I were them I would be spitting that I don't want to be "protected" thanks: I just want to be able to do my work. The "protect" thing makes them sound like swoony hanky-clutching scullery maids. Which they are not.
Actually, neither was I. One boss complained I should not stand with my arms folded at a meeting because it seemed aggressive. Would any man dare do that today? I just unfolded them. I thought I was tough but I wasn't.
But I have also had powerful male bosses who have been mentors to me. There was terrifying Herky, who looked like an old rocker but had a Mensa-level brain and to this day I have never met a man who drank his tea so strong or swore so much. And ferocious Ed, with Vulcan chess mastery when it came to getting a scoop, but who then would get on the phone and whisper to his daughter: "Pookiesnookins!"