At heart, I disapprove of this trend for rewriting or rethinking the classics - the endless Austen spin-offs for example, and the succession of James Bond "continuation novels". I suspect these are becoming ever more common, not due to writers running out of original ideas but because publishers are doing it tough and are much happier sticking with reliable franchises.
So along comes Jeeves And The Wedding Bells by Sebastian Faulks (Random House), a homage to English humorist P.G. Wodehouse that I approached with an extravagant roll of the eyes. Wodehouse wrote more than 90 books, for goodness sake. Surely enough to keep even the most dedicated fans going.
Actually, I imagine many of those most dedicated fans will be harsh critics of Faulks' little piece of fan fiction. How can they not compare it to the originals and find it wanting? But I read Wodehouse long enough ago that I'm misty on the details and I found Faulks' take on them charming and as entertaining as anyone could wish a novel to be.
The plot twist is that lovable toff Bertie Wooster and his manservant Jeeves swap roles in a bid to smooth the path of true love. This provides plenty of scope for comedy and plays nicely into the current fascination with the upstairs-downstairs lifestyle of the British aristocracy early last century.