Ashleigh Young on why having a nemesis is no longer cool.
I might be wrong but I think the age of the nemesis might finally have turned. For a while there, if you were anyone, you had a nemesis. It was like SUVs, or tiny handbags – you looked around one day and suddenly everyone had one. Everyone was a superhero in their own universe. People spoke of their nemeses in dark, cinematic tones. The identity of one's nemesis was never publicly disclosed, because that would descend into bullying, which was vulgar and having a nemesis was an art. Your nemesis was not an enemy, exactly; they were someone for whom you not only held an eternal dislike but in whom your dislike found a worthy contender. "People often ask if, for example, the President is my nemesis," Roxane Gay wrote in July, "but that would absolutely be beneath me.' She had 10 nemeses, she said, and used an app to keep track of them. Gay, tweeting about her nemeses since 2011, was said to have fomented the global enthusiasm for nemesis-having.
The thing about the nemesis-having community was that it was entirely self-governed. Anyone was ripe for the picking. The selection process was often guided by envy – many nemeses seemed to live perfect lives, with brilliant career trajectories and lovely homes – or by a feeling of being wronged by someone who was cheerily oblivious to that fact. It could be someone who said "Awesome!" a lot. Someone who'd bought all of their Christmas presents by September. Someone who actually seemed really nice but was somehow unbearable, like a scratchy clothes tag on your soul.
"My nemesis is having a good year professionally and has clear skin. It's a lot to take," Gay tweeted last year.
Central to nemesis-having was the performance of the feud – the serving up of a petty beef for others' entertainment. It was like pro-wrestling – obviously theatrical, with all of the flinging about of bodies, chairs broken over backs and forks jabbed in the eye, but somehow it was also deadly serious.