Who gets to decide whether a design is "good"?
The people, the site, the rain, the sun, the wind, the clouds, the ocean, the sky, the land. I often tell my architecture students that the site has a huge say with their design concepts, therefore reference its historical, cultural, spiritual, environmental and climatic contexts, so architecture becomes the custodian between the site and the occupant.
Is all design really just a search for meaning?
The key is what is that "meaning" to you? I have seen and engaged with design that has no meaning to me, but is a beautiful object that seemed to be dropped from out of space. It has no specificity to the surroundings. We live in a world of pragmatic and practical solutions and we see a lot of that in our housing here in NZ today. On the flip side, we have some amazing design work done by our own architects.