In response to Treaty debate I would like to defend the view of Tariana Turia. Separatism is not the issue. It is the reality of partnership from a Maori perspective also. The aim is partnership, protection and participation as a constitutional right.
The article on Valentine's Day by the senior lecture of film studies at Massey University leaves me wondering is it potentially screening as a "comedy" or joining that of Paul Holmes as a "tragedy"?
To see what positive things are happening in so many places you have only to look around. Tariana and many others have looked at Whanau Ora. This aims at exactly what Te Whanau o Waipareira Trust has struggled as an urban Maori identity to do -- actively functioning within a Government framework to uphold the tikanga of their identity as Maori, answering the need of their people, taking responsibility for the present situation and improving the lot of themselves and their children.
Get a life Paul Holmes, in the shelter of a dominant social group you may be unaware of the hidden talents and the growing changes within the minority, but indigenous, people of Aotearoa.
I do not intend to misinterpret the comments on the article "Treaty Exaltation has gone too far". Clear political and democratic realities differ around Aotearoa. It is also an educational reality that each of us lives in a bubble that seems to be too easily pricked and popped if the sum total of our background cannot equate with the ethnic difference.