Naturally I asked Panuku the obvious questions which were, how and why does Eke Panuku Development have a social housing quota? I was baffled that this could be legal let alone feasible. It was also an alleged breach of the Human Rights Act as it discriminates against superannuitants, welfare beneficiaries and Aucklanders earning under $80,000 a year.
This question saw the council terminate our contract for Old Tavern Lane. Firstly we still had a binding contract and secondly they were denying housing to those who needed it and, more importantly, were entitled to it. So we booked our seat at the Human Rights Tribunal which is now set for Monday May 16, 2022, to represent everyone eligible for social and affordable housing.
The Panuku social engineering quota system, one-third each to social, market and open market housing, is a farce. The latter two groups often go to speculators who then place social housing renters in their private home but receive state paid subsidies. Subsequently developers turn that property into at least 60 per cent social housing anyway.
The rise of superannuitants who have worked all of their lives on low wages yet remain unsuccessful at securing their own home because of that, should not be prejudiced by ignorant social engineering policies applied by highly paid, non elected and non performing bureaucrats.
On July 6, 2020, Panuku chief executive David Rankin wrote to me personally stating Auckland Council had dropped its 30 per cent cap on social housing, therefore in his opinion, the Human Rights Tribunal was no longer necessary. We disagreed because Mr Rankin and his board could easily reinstate their quota.
Panuku Development went on to sell the Old Tavern property to another iwi. It also offered an out-of-court settlement including part payment of our court costs plus three
different pieces of land it basically could not get rid of. It was a Clayton's offer badly disguised as an act of good faith.
Auckland's lack of social housing is a fact, a problem, and it's only getting worse. To the killjoys, this is not us playing the "Māori" card, because social housing does not discriminate, it includes all races, our middle class and the elderly who are all desperate for homes.
Had that 30 per cent social housing cap not existed, right now families would be tending to their gardens, preparing kai and discussing their day over a cuppa in their own homes down Old Tavern Lane, Papatoetoe.
Instead, years down the line with hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees mounting, we have litigation with one party representing those needing social housing, and the other group refusing to admit it simply got it wrong.
John Tamihere is a former Labour Cabinet minister and chief executive of Whānau Ora and West Auckland Urban Māori organisation Te Whānau o Waipareira.
