There's been some volatile tit-for-tat accusations of cultural appropriation in the Auckland restaurant scene. It has led popular Auckland eatery Coco's Cantina to consider changing its name after 11 years as a staple Italian restaurant and bar on K-Road. It all started when yet-to-open seafood restaurant kingi was accused of
'It's treacherous ground right now': Chefs and culture experts on respectful restaurant names
Yukio Ozeki, head chef and owner of new Ponsonby restaurant, Azabu. Photo / Nick Reed
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
Half-Chinese Kiwi restaurateur Lucien Law owns 10 prominent Auckland restaurants spanning Parnell's Non Solo Pizza to Ponsonby's Azabu.
His answer immediately revealed how fraught it is to hold restaurant owners and workers to such standards.
"I'm half-Chinese, I don't have a Chinese restaurant. I'm lucky to have Yukoi Ozeki [head chef of Azabu]. He's born and bred Tokyo. We've worked together for nine years," Law said.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
"But I don't think it matters. People vote with their feet. I guess I have an opinion, I think it's fine, whether you're from that country or not, you're trying to represent it, give it a twist.
"I wouldn't have a problem with a Japanese guy having a cafe, I think it's great."
Even if you want to bring numbers into this murky stew, things didn't add up.
According to the Restaurant Association of NZ, 42 per cent of Auckland's 133,000 hospitality workers are migrants - many presumably cooking up and serving menus equally foreign to them as their diners.
The cultural angst began when Coco's Cantina co-founder Damaris Coulter accused fellow young restaurateurs Tom Hishon and Josh Helm of appropriating the Māori word for king in their new restaurant venture.
Hishon and Helm had always maintained the name kingi was a colloquial shortening for kingfish used by fishermen the world over, and they had deliberately left the Māori macron out of its spelling.
Coulter's Instagram barrage led to some reciprocal accusations by Auckland-based Māori graphic designer, Anzac Tereihana Tasker, who had advised Hishon and Helm in their kingi name choice.
Tasker suggested Coco was a derogatory term for black people and Pacific Islanders, and that the Coulter sisters had appropriated the concept of a Cantina as they weren't Spanish.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
Many other people online pointed out what they saw as the hypocrisy of Damaris Coulter's comments, but most stopped short of suggesting the name Coco's Cantina was a genuinely offensive appropriation.
But it has left Coco's Cantina owners considering changing their restaurant's name.
Outside social media, the feedback from most Māori cultural experts contacted by the Weekend Herald has been far more sympathetic to Hishon and Helm's efforts to culturally consult Māori over the name kingi.
Māori cultural adviser Karaitiana Taiuru argued that the kingi restaurant name was actually "promoting the Māori language" and that legitimate culinary or linguistic appropriation of Māori culture was a very short list.
"A non-Māori using Māori words for the business is fine as long as they know what the word means, and the word isn't a sacred name or a person's name, or associated within an event," Taiuru said.
"So if it's just a normal word it's not appropriation. But it certainly is if you're using sensitive words, and it just boils down to just a bit of consultation."
Appropriation of Māori cuisine was also fairly simple in Taiuru's mind.
"Pre-colonisation, food was either eaten raw, roasted over a fire, or steamed - the hangi," he said.
"Some restaurants I am aware of, they just use different New Zealand species, [like] kina. I don't see any issue with that.
"I would if there was maybe a non-Māori person with a hangi. I think that would be a bit strange."
Te Aroha Grace has served as the general manager of Auckland iwi Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei and was brought into consult over Hishon and Helms' new venture.
Grace said there were no hard and fast rules over Māori cultural appropriation. The determining factor was the extent to which a business has engaged with the local iwi over a name, image or product.
In this case it should have directly been Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei iwi as the local authority.
"To me, the cultural appropriation is only if Tom [Hishon] never convened anyone," Grace said.
"If he just went ahead and did this of his own volition without any vocation to engage and convene the cultural energies that were involved. That's the tragedy that lots of Pākehā are suffering from. They just don't know how to engage."
"It's treacherous ground right now because cultural appropriation is a trend. That's because of Black Lives Matter, all of these things which we know.
"Even Māori, everyone's got to be careful that they think they've got a monopoly on the truth."
University of Auckland co-head of the school of Māori and Pacific studies, Dr Jemaima Tiatia-Seath, was less accommodating of the kingi name if it had been a direct reference the Māori word.
"My first gut reaction is that's not cool," Tiatia-Seath said. "Kingitanga, you kind of don't go there."
"Me being in the business of decolonising lots of narratives that I work on daily and I guess these little things do get under your skin a little bit.
But in light of Hishon and Helm's claim they didn't mean to reference the Māori word kīngi, Tiatia-Seath softened.
"As long as a business is completely open about it having no cultural connotations then I suppose that's fine," Tiatia-Seath said.
"If there was consultation, it wouldn't really matter who was fronting the business as long as local iwi felt good about it."
Massey University Professor Paul Spoonley is a social sciences academic with expertise in race relations and echoed the Māori cultural advisors in prioritising engagement.
But Spoonley acknowledged - just as the Herald found - that notions of appropriation are problematic amid the diversity of viewpoints within the Māori community.
"The difficulty comes in that even among those who have some sort of cultural claim, they might disagree on how important it is," Spoonley said.
"So it becomes both difficult to have a conversation, and to resolve the issues when you've got so many competing viewpoints.
"I think it's really important that we don't misuse or mispronounce names. But we use borrowed language all the time and language itself is changing. So we need to be pragmatic in this.
"I think we're in a process of negotiating what's appropriate and what's not, and these are incredibly sensitive discussions. But in the process, you don't want to veto or close off options."
And then there are the chefs themselves, who above all else ended most conversations with the overarching wish their business just survive the year 2020.
Rebecca Nelson is co-owner of newly opened Ahi restaurant in Commercial Bay with chef Ben Bayly.
Neither of the pair have Māori heritage but decided on the te reo name for fire, ahi, to acknowledge "the people that were here first".
To bring it full circle, the pair did meet Damaris Coulter, among a number of other Māori consultants.
"We took very seriously what she was saying to us, to make sure nothing on our social media or website was offensive," Nelson said.
"I was mortified to think that we were trying to benefit financially from jumping on the Māori bandwagon so to speak.
"That was so far from why we called it Ahi. It was very much as a nod to New Zealand."
