On Sunday, the gay online publication Queerty released an interview with longtime "Sesame Street" writer Mark Saltzman that touched on the relationship between popular characters Bert and Ernie. Asked whether he'd thought of them "as a gay couple," Saltzman responded, "I always felt that without a huge agenda, when I was writing Bert & Ernie, they were. I didn't have any other way to contextualise them."
In the wake of this admission, the internet went wild with the "confirmation" that the cohabiting Muppets are, as so many of us have always suspected, queer.
On Tuesday, the official Sesame Street Twitter account posted that Bert and Ernie were merely "created to be best friends." Frank Oz, their creator, also addressed it, this time with a dismissive shrug.
"They're not, of course," Oz wrote. "But why that question? Does it really matter? Why the need to define people as only gay?"
Queer people have been hearing these questions for our entire lives, especially when we seek images of ourselves in the media we consume. We hear them most often when we zero in on characters who aren't explicitly queer, and - for the record - we often zero in on characters who aren't explicitly queer because very few characters are that way: What would it add if we learned that Xena is bisexual or Dumbledore is gay in the actual text of their respective stories? Why do we need to know that Korra and Asami of "The Legend of Korra," or Ruby and Sapphire of "Steven Universe," or Princess Bubblegum and Marceline of "Adventure Time" are romantic couples, not just platonic friends? If there's more to this character than their sexual orientation, why should we bother correcting the assumption that they're hetero?