Ahead of the Line of Duty finale, writer Jed Mercurio tells Chris Harvey about lies, plot holes and keeping us in suspense.
'I don't like journalists deliberately lying about my show because they wanna be smug or snide, and I will challenge that," says Jed Mercurio. The writer of Line of Duty and Bodyguard, who gets audiences worked up like no other contemporary dramatist, is getting worked up, too.
We're days away from the finale of another thrilling series of Line of Duty, one that has had viewers rushing to social media to scream "Oh my God!" at the end of almost every episode, as protagonists and much-loved characters alike have been killed off. I've been chatting to the 53-year-old Mercurio about his social media scraps. Just this week he launched a tirade at a Sun writer who claimed one of the show's stars had been offered a contract for two more series. "This story is a lie," he wrote, before calling the journalist something unpublishable.
Last year, as Bodyguard gripped the nation, he attacked a series of articles criticising his riveting drama about a home secretary sleeping with her personal protection officer, as a female suicide bomber targeted civilians. "A hatchet job," he railed, "another factually incorrect, distorted piece", and, finally, for the Spectator's James Delingpole, "What a p****".
"If a critic says I didn't like that show, then that's their opinion and I don't care," Mercurio says. "If they say this was a plot hole, they're putting that forward as a fact and what I am saying is either they are mistaken, or they are deliberately lying."