Johnny Depp loses his libel case against Dan Wootton and The Sun. Video / @TalkRadio
Johnny Depp's lawyers have vowed to appeal his "bewildering" loss in his libel case against The Sun newspaper.
The 57-year-old actor heard on Monday that his defamation accusation against the publication - who had branded him a wife-beater who had assaulted then-spouse Amber Heard - had been dismissedin London's High Court, but he's not happy with the "flawed" judgement and will be taking further action.
Jenny Afia of Schillings, who represented the 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' actor, said in a statement: "This decision is as perverse as it is bewildering. The judgment is so flawed that it would be ridiculous for Mr. Depp not to appeal this decision."
Johnny Depp arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand on July 14, 2020. Photo / Getty
In his ruling, Judge Andrew Nicol said The Sun's 2018 story was "substantially true" and ruled that 12 out of Amber's 14 allegations of physical violence had happened, while the other two had not been fully proven.
In response, the 'Pirates of the Caribbean' star's legal team insisted the judge had disregarded a "mountain of counter-evidence" against the 'Danish Girl' star's testimony.
The statement continued: "Most troubling is the Judge's reliance on the testimony of Amber Heard, and corresponding disregard of the mountain of counter-evidence from police officers, medical practitioners, her own former assistant, other unchallenged witnesses and an array of documentary evidence which completely undermined the allegations, point by point.
American actress Amber Heard, former wife of actor Johnny Depp. Photo / AP
"All of this was overlooked."
Johnny also has pending lawsuits in Virginia relating to a Washington Post article written by Amber about her experiences as a domestic violence victim and his lawyer said they hoped for a more fair hearing.
She said: "We hope that in contrast to this case, the ongoing libel proceedings in America are equitable, with both parties providing full disclosure rather than one side strategically cherry-picking what evidence can and cannot be relied upon."
Meanwhile, Amber's US attorney, Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, insisted that both the "decision and judgment are not a surprise".
She added in a statement: "Very soon, we will be presenting even more voluminous evidence in the US.
"We are committed to obtaining justice for Amber Heard in the US court and defending Ms. Heard's right to free speech."
