Written by novelist Nic Pizzolatto and envisioned as an "anthology series", meaning that each season will tell a different story involving a different cast of characters, the first season of True Detective follows detectives Rust Cohle (McConaughey) and Martin Hart (Harrelson) as they relate the story of a serial killer investigation they did in 1995, in a set of interviews with a pair of detectives looking into the reappearance of the killer in 2012.
The interviews are a rather brilliant conceit for the show, allowing writer Pizzolatto to tell the story more organically and without being tied to a specific timeline, and calling into question the reliability of what we're being told by Cohle and Hart, both of whom seem troubled by what transpired in 1995.
Yet, at the same time, "what transpired in 1995" doesn't seem too important to the show. The killing that provides a catalyst for what we're seeing takes a back seat to the character dynamics between Cohle and Hart. Their investigation feels less important, or feels like it was purposely written to feel less important, than the change that is taking place with our leading men, and how they've been affected by the case they're investigating.
McConaughey is definitely the stand-out here, essentially playing two different characters. The Cohle of 1995 and the Cohle of 2012 are two different beasts entirely: the first is depressively philosophical about the case and the world, obviously disillusioned by what he sees, a ghost of himself because of events that took place before we met him. The second is defiant and dishevelled, throwing his hands up at the world in exasperation.
The 1995 edition is seeing the truth of the world for the first time, while the 2012 version has accepted it, made peace with it. The change between 1995 and 2012 is so severe, you'd be forgiven for thinking Cohle was played by two different actors. Yes, McConaughey is that good, playing both with such skill that he'd be getting award buzz for either one, let alone for both.
That is not to say that Harrelson isn't good too, because he absolutely is. The rest of the supporting case - particularly Kevin Dunn, the grumpy police captain who sees how good his detectives are - turn in some good work as well. But I just think McConaughey is operating at a different level entirely.
True Detective also benefits from some tight writing and direction, courtesy of creator Pizzolatto and Cary Fukunaga (Jane Eyre). The pair are writing and directing every episode this season, which should give the show a consistency that is lacking in most serial dramas. Fukunaga's flair for scenery and colour, especially, make for a visually impressive series.
If there was a criticism, it would be the over-familiarity of some of the horror elements. There has been viewer movement away from this type of twist-ridden, dark and disturbing crime show, purely based on the sheer number on the air - Broadchurch (coming to One), Hannibal (coming very soon to TV3), The Bridge, The Killing, Forbrydelsen, Top Of The Lake, and The Following are just a few off the top of my head.
Pizzolatto does veer into some of the tropes: creepy musical cues, pseudo-religious imagery and even the odd use of antlers (a familiar sight on Hannibal) mark the killer as a particularly disturbed individual and, as a result, the case ends up being the least interesting thing about the show.
Fortunately, it isn't meant to be the most interesting thing about True Detective. It all comes back to those characters, those leading performances. The increased focus on Cohle and Hart ensures that any problems with the story are quickly forgotten.
And in that context, this is a well written show - with the exception of a few serial killer clichés - that benefits from a superb showing from McConaughey and a wonderfully unique visual style.
* True Detective airs Tuesdays at 8.30pm on SoHo.
Did you watch the season premiere of True Detective? What did you think?
