Rather, it's the way this small change disrupts habitual behaviours and helps people draw a tighter linkage between the environmental awareness that they already possess, and actions in the world that actually advance that consciousness and their values.
Such is the upshot of a new study on plastic-bag charges published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology by a team of Argentinian researchers, led by psychologist Adriana Jakovcevic of Buenos Aires University. Charging a relatively small amount for bags "produces changes in behaviour," says Jakovcevic, "and these changes are not only because of the economic value of the incentive - there are also some other processes at play that involve environmental concerns."
As the researchers note, Buenos Aires provides a perfect opportunity to study the effects of plastic-bag charges because in 2012, the vast city's Environmental Protection Agency put in place bag restrictions that in turn led the leading supermarket chain association to institute a bag charge (the equivalent of 2.5 US cents for bags of medium size and 4 cents for large bags) on Octoober 9, 2012.
For smaller supermarket associations, meanwhile, the same charge went into effect roughly two months later on December 10, 2012. But for Gran Buenos Aires, the larger area that surrounds the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), there was no change instituted at all.
This is, the researchers note, a "natural experiment": You have three groups of supermarket shoppers, two of which experienced new bag charges at different times, and one of which did not experience plastic-bag charges at all.
So the researchers conducted several field studies, observing shoppers leaving supermarkets in low-to-middle income areas in the three different regions at different times - before any policies went into place, after the first change, and after the second change.
The result was that, sure enough, the policies greatly increased the percentage of shoppers who were observed to be carrying their own bag. Clearly, the bag fees worked to dramatically increase the habit of people carrying their own bags.
But importantly, in a second study that involved directly interviewing consumers who were observed to leave supermarkets carrying either plastic bags or their own bags, the researchers tried to get at why they had begun to adopt this new behaviour, rather than paying the relatively small bag charges.
First, it turned out that a surprising number of people didn't like the bag-charge policy, but started carrying their own bags anyway. According to Jakovcevic, it is likely that the small economic cost is the best way of explaining the behaviour of these individuals. Past research, however, has called into question whether a purely economic effect like this is a lasting one, with sustained influence on behaviour.
But there was another group of Argentinian shoppers - those who supported the charge and carried their own bags for reasons of environmental concern. They cared much less about economics and much more about green motives. "The people who supported the policy most, they also say they do it for environmental reasons," says Jakovcevic, "and this is a stronger finding because it was an open question, the people could say anything that comes into their mind, and most of them say it was to protect the environment."
For these shoppers, says Jakovcevic, the policy provided an opportunity to "rethink why they are using plastic bags or their own bags, and if they care about the environment, this will push them to change their behavior and change it longer over time."
So just maybe a little charge can indeed help the environment. You don't have to confiscate all the plastic bags in the world to save the environment. You can just give people the slightest push, and let them fix the problem themselves.