"America's trade war with the world limited the trade deficit red ink for a time but it now looks like the terms of trade are changing back despite the tariffs and sanctions and the country will likely remain dependent on foreign goods for years to come, no matter who is president," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG.
James Watson, senior US economist at Oxford Economics, said: "Trade is recovering, but very unevenly. Exports lag well behind imports, and trade in services is suffering far worse than trade in goods."
The 2020 election campaign has been far less driven by clashes over trade than the presidential race four years ago, as Trump's handling of coronavirus and the recession triggered by the virus have dominated the race.
Trump had hoped that his "phase one" agreement with China, which was signed in January and halted new tariff increases in exchange for large-scale Chinese purchases of US goods, would prove that he had confronted unfair trade practices by Beijing more successfully than his predecessors.
However, China's purchases of American goods, including agricultural products, have fallen short of expectations under the deal, as bilateral tensions continued to flare because of the pandemic.
Joe Biden, Trump's Democratic challenger for the White House, has not emphasised the need to reduce America's trade deficit as much as the incumbent president, but has campaigned on plans to direct US government procurement towards American suppliers, cutting out global supply chains.
Written by: James Politi
© Financial Times