For decades it was a given that the back seat of a car was the safest place in a crash, but that's no longer certain. Photo / Insurance Institute for Highway safety via The New York Times
For decades it was a given that the back seat of a car is the safest place in a crash. But that's no longer certain, as advances in seat belt technology up front have been slow to jump to the back seat.
Safety researchers now have new recommendations about what to buy and where to sit, highlighting vehicles whose rear seats have the kind of sophisticated seat belts that have protected front-seat riders for roughly a decade.
Those belts tighten up when sensors detect a crash is imminent. They also can loosen a bit if the occupant is pressing against the belt so hard that the belt might cause an injury.
If belts with this better technology aren't available in the back seat, people 55 and older should sit in the front of newer vehicles with those more sophisticated belts, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Researchers say seat belts in most rear seats lack these so-called load limiters, which means they can't loosen up. So, in a frontal crash, the belt can cause chest, abdominal or spinal injuries, according to a new study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Researchers investigated frontal crashes that killed or seriously injured 117 rear-seat occupants between 6 and 92 years old.
"There was evidence of significant seat belt forces on the chest of occupants of all ages," said Jessica Jermakian, a researcher at the institute, which is funded by the insurance industry.
Nevertheless, those rear seat belts — without load limiters or the "pre-tensioners" that tighten for a crash — meet federal safety standards, which are considered a minimum level of protection.
Researchers say improvements are needed because the back is likely to be occupied more often, with people such as older adults who have given up driving or passengers using ride-hailing services like Uber. The safety of the back seat could become a bigger focus with autonomous vehicles.
And within a few years it may be possible for consumers to learn which models best protect back-seat occupants. By 2022, the insurance institute hopes to have a back-seat crash test, allowing buyers to compare new models.
That may prompt automakers to make improvements absent federal regulations. The insurance institute has no regulatory authority, but automakers have proved sensitive to the publicity generated by bad ratings and eager to advertise good ratings.
The federal highway safety agency said in December 2015 that it was considering such a crash test, but it has yet to offer one.
Technically, the back seat did not get more dangerous. The front seats just kept getting safer.
Making front-seat safety a priority made sense, said Aditya Belwadi, a researcher at the Center for Injury Research and Prevention at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Front-seat occupants experience most of the force of a frontal crash. Those in the back have the advantage of distance.
"You have a substantial amount of space that we call a crush space, between you and the other vehicle," Belwadi said. "A lot of crash energy is dissipated between the front seat and back seat."
Automakers also didn't focus on the back seat because it was often unoccupied, and upgrading the safety equipment would cost more, said Jingwen Hu, a research associate professor at the University of Michigan's Transportation Research Center who has studied back-seat safety.
Other studies have noted that adults 55 and older — who tend to have more fragile bones — can be injured by the belts. But the institute's study points to risks for children, Jermakian said.
"This was really the first time we got a clear understanding of how children are also getting those injuries," she said.
Researchers and the highway safety agency agree that children under 13 should still sit in the back because crashes are complex events and that while improvements are needed, the back seat is still safest for them overall.
"We have a lot of data to support that," said Belwadi of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. "It is still very safe in the back seat."
Why should older adults sit up front and not children?
"Kids are complicated," Hu of the University of Michigan said. "They are very different from older folks in terms of injury patterns and mechanisms."
And while the institute study found that seat belts can cause serious injuries, a 2014 institute study showed there is a far greater danger in not wearing one, Jermakian said. That hazard includes being thrown into the occupants up front, injuring them.
It is possible to put seat belts like those up front in the back seat, and a few automakers are doing that. It's not as simple as using the exact same technology, however. When the belt loosens, for example, it may allow the head to move too far forward and hit the back of the front seats, Hu said. In the front seat there's an air bag to protect the head as the force limiter eases its grip. There's no air bag in the back seat, and putting one there is tricky because the front seats aren't stationary.
That's why Ford developed a seat belt that inflates like an air bag, so it holds the occupant securely but spreads the force over a wider area, said Srinivasan Sundararajan, a safety researcher at Ford. Introduced as an option on the 2011 Explorer, it is now available on several models.
Early research indicates that the inflatable belt should be "highly effective," Hu said.
But it hasn't been a hit with customers, Ford acknowledged. One issue was that the larger-than-normal belt buckle was hard to use for children or people with dexterity issues. And customers may not have understood the benefit of paying extra.
So Ford is changing its strategy and will offer belts with pre-tensioners and load limiters in the back seat as standard equipment on many models, said Desi Ujkashevic, Ford's global director for its Automotive Safety Office.
"Safety continues to evolve," she said.
Here are the current models that automakers say have load limiters and pre-tensioners for the second-row back seats adjacent to windows:
• Audi: A3 sedan, S3 sedan, RS3 Sedan, A3 Cabriolet, A3 Sportback, A4 allroad, A4, S4, A5 Cabriolet, S5 Cabriolet, A5 Coupe, S5 Coupe, RS5 Coupe, A5 Sportback, S5 Sportback, RS5 Sportback, A6, S6, A7, S7, A8, Q3, Q5, SQ5, Q7, Q8, TT Coupe, TTS Coupe, TT RS Coupe, TT Roadster.
• BMW:Model Year 2019: 3 Series, 5 Series, 6 Series Gran Turismo, 7 Series, 8 Series, X5 and X7; Model Year 2020: 3 Series, 5 Series, 6 Series Gran Turimso, 7 Series, 8 Series, X3, X4, X5, X6 and X7.
• Ford: 2020 Explorer, 2020 Explorer ST, 2019 Edge, 2020 Escape.
• Jaguar:2019 E-PACE, 2019 F-PACE, 2019 I-PACE, 2019 XE, 2019 XF.
• Land Rover:2019 Discovery Sport, 2019 Discovery, 2019 Range Rover Evoque, Range Rover Velar, Range Rover Sport.
• Lexus:2019 LS 500 and 500h, 2020 LC 500 and LC 500h, 2019 ES 350, 2019 ES 300h, 2019 GS 300 and 350, 2019 GS F, 2019 IS 300 and 350, 2019 RC F, 2019 RC 300 and 350, 2019 RX 350 and 350L, 2019 RX 450h and 450hL, 2019 GX 460, 2019 LX 570, 2019 UX 200 and 250h.
• Lincoln:2020 Aviator, 2019 Nautilus, 2020 Corsair.
• Mercedes-Benz:"Belt Bags" available on S-Class and E-Class. Did not provide information on pre-tensioners and load limiters.
• Nissan:2019 Nissan Altima and Nissan Murano.
• Toyota:2019 Avalon and Avalon Hybrid, 2019 Camry and Camry Hybrid, 2019 Land Cruiser, 2019 Mirai, 2019 C-HR.
• Volkswagen:2019 Passat.
• Volvo (2019 and 2020 models): XC90, S90, V90, V90 Cross Country, XC60, S60, V60, V60 Cross Country, XC40.
Written by: Christopher Jensen
© 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Pie Funds CIO Mike Taylor makes his annual picks for the year ahead.