In comparing recent Budgets on either side of the Tasman, there's been a stark difference in the approach to combating multinational tax avoidance. On one hand, egged on by a gleeful Aussie media and supported by a Senate inquiry, Treasurer Joe Hockey (right) savagely lambasted the "dirty thirty" multinationals who have been conspicuously using a range of clever (and hitherto legal) schemes to avoid paying tax. Meanwhile, the New Zealand Budget produced a brilliant side-step, burying mentions of policy work on multinational tax avoidance deep within supplementary papers. With Labour still smarting over the withering putdown last time they raised this issue (remember the "ban on Facebook"?), there doesn't seem to be much appetite for doing anything in a hurry, beyond waiting for someone else to take the lead. While NZ can rightly claim a transtasman leadership on many tax matters, it doesn't seem the same can be said about the erosion of the tax base.
Off the list
The Queen's Birthday Honours list threw out the usual suspects, but civil servants are perplexed by the fact that not one former mandarin managed to make the cut. Once upon a time, some retired public servant would get a gong, but this time it seems no one was deemed worthy.
Gumball Rally
Companies and Government departments share a fondness for using - some would say abusing - the language to make things seem more interesting than they are. New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, for example, named an IT project "Velocity", staff induction was called "Ignite", 90-day plan reviews are "Impact Briefings" and a product development machine was called the "Gumball". A review of NZTE says that its messaging might be seen as having "a slightly evangelical tone", but the reviewers go on to conclude that this sort of language is "in fact catalytic rather than evangelical",