The owner of an equipment hire company is considering crusading against a law ordering businesses to hand back payments from firms that turn out to be insolvent.
Bill McEntee says a section of the Companies Act, which allows liquidators to claw back payments made in the run-up to a company's failure, is "totally unfair".
North Island-wide McEntee Hire has just lost a case in the Rotorua High Court against liquidators of paving business Taupo Paving and More.
The court has ruled that McEntee Hire must pay back $21,400 it earned from Taupo Paving in early 2008, several months before the company went into liquidation.
Section 292 of the Companies Act, designed to stop creditor queue-jumping, says liquidators have the right to demand the return of payments made to a firm's creditors up to two years prior to its collapse.
Associate Judge Tony Christiansen said in the Rotorua decision the business relationship between McEntee Hire and Taupo Paving changed on January 9, 2008, when McEntee issued Taupo Paving with a Stop Credit Notice; Taupo was behind with its bills and McEntee referred the debt to a collection agency.
"A reasonable person in McEntee's position would have suspected the company was insolvent."
Bill McEntee said: "I've been in business 32 years, I've never had this before."
He was prepared to campaign against the law if there was support and assistance from the business community.
Boss wins backing
Readers reacted strongly to the Herald on Sunday's story last week about Boss Systems, the North Shore cabling company which has been given notice under Section 292 to hand back $37,000 it received last year from a now-failed electrical firm.
No justice:
This has to be another law written by people who have never been in business, especially SMEs. The company mentioned in the article did the work and got paid, end of story. That's how business is done.
Another case of there is no justice, just a legal system.
John Shears, Birkenhead
Hang on to cash:
It appears to me the liquidators are chasing the smaller business on the pretence that they would not put up much resistance as they would not have the capital for large legal fees.
Boss Systems, hang on to that money and tell them to go get s*%@#d as you have a greater responsibility to your staff, creditors and shareholders.
Rob, Forrest Hill
It's ridiculous:
Ridiculous, what are you supposed to do - create an online balance sheet for businesses to refer to with every purchase order?
Jonathan Stormont, Sydney
Insolvency question:
With the Privacy Act how does one know they are insolvent? Owning a small business one tries to get paid in order to pay employees, tax, account payables and so on.
Christine, Murrays Bay
More protection:
I'd like to see the period extended to five or more years if it means better recoveries for investors in finance companies. I wonder how much preferential treatment anyone got from failing finance companies before they declared failure?
Dennis, Wellington
Owner may start crusade over law
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.