The uproar over a Hamilton retailer using the term 'jandal' to sell flip flops highlights the blurred line between a trademarked name and a generic term, an intellectual property expert says.
Online retailer Lastseason.co.nz was last week served with a letter asking the Hamilton-based company to stop using the term 'jandal' to advertise footwear on their website as they were in breach of a trademark.
The retailer argued that 'jandals' is a generic term for everybody to use and that raises questions about whether the trademark can be enforced, James & Wells Intellectual property lawyer Gus Hazel said.
"The purpose of a trademark is to be distinctive of a supplier, not descriptive of the goods. Therefore, trademarks are one area of law where a registered rights owner can be a victim of its own success," Hazel said.
Sandford Industries Ltd, which brought the jandal trademark in 1995, recently sent the cease and desist letter to Lastseason.co.nz.