For more than two years, followers have pored over tangled clues purportedly posted online by a high-ranking government official known only as "Q".
The conspiracy theory emerged in a dark corner of the internet but has recently crept into mainstream politics. Trump has retweeted QAnon-promoting accounts and its followers flock to his rallies wearing clothes and hats with QAnon symbols and slogans.
Last week, Marjorie Tyler Greene, a House candidate who openly supports QAnon, won her Republican primary in Georgia.
She's part of a growing list of candidates who have expressed support for QAnon. Lauren Boebert, another candidate who has expressed support for QAnon, recently upset a five-term congressman in a Republican primary in Colorado.
Facebook said it will only remove groups and accounts outright if they they discuss potential violence, including in veiled language.
"We will continue studying specific terminology and symbolism used by supporters to identify the language used by these groups and movements indicating violence and take action accordingly," the company said.
Facebook will still restrict the material it doesn't remove, initially by no longer recommending it. For instance, when people join a QAnon group, Facebook will not recommend similar groups to join.
Neither will it suggest QAnon references in searches or, in the near future, allow it in ads.
As a result of the policy changes, Facebook says it has removed over 790 groups, 100 pages and 1500 ads tied to QAnon on Facebook and has blocked over 300 hashtags across Facebook and Instagram.
There are 1950 other groups and 440 Facebook says it has identified that remain on the platform but face restrictions, along with 10,000 accounts on Instagram.
For militia organisations and those encouraging riots, including some who may identify as antifa, the company said it has removed over 980 groups, 520 Pages and 160 ads from Facebook.
Facebook said it is not banning QAnon outright because the group does not meet "rigorous" criteria for the platform to designate it a "dangerous organisation".
But it is expanding this policy to address the movement because it has "demonstrated significant risks to public safety".
- AP