The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) considered Crowther’s intention in this regard to be material information, which, if generally available, would be likely to have a material effect on the price of Pushpay’s shares at the time.
The FMA alleged that the individual knew of, and used, that information to advise or encourage others to trade in the lead-up to Crowther’s announcement.
Crowther’s trading was legitimate, and neither he nor Pushpay was a party to the proceedings.
FMA head of enforcement Margot Gatland said insider trading was a serious offence that undermines investor confidence in the New Zealand markets and gives individuals an unfair advantage.
“The guilty verdict demonstrates the serious consequences for advising or encouraging others to trade when in possession of material information, not generally available to the market.
“The individual took advantage of knowledge they gained as a member of Pushpay’s senior leadership team to assist those who they advised or encouraged to avoid potential losses,” she said.
“The FMA takes all insider conduct cases seriously and will take enforcement action where it considers misconduct has occurred. Taking such cases assists in the promotion of confident and informed participation of the financial markets and promotes fairness, efficiency, and transparency in those markets.”