If the beneficiary were a charity, the tax rate would be zero.
So, trustees could game the system by making accounting entries saying they’d transferred funds to charities, all the while keeping the funds in the trust – earning more interest in the case of a bank deposit, for example.
Inland Revenue recognised that trustees who didn’t physically pass the funds on to the charities they said they would in 2022, might have done so in 2023.
It said it was now collecting opening and closing balances owed to beneficiaries to monitor the situation.
Inland Revenue also noted that in Australia, payments need to be made within two months of notification. Otherwise, the income is taxed at the trustee rate.
Nightingale said Inland Revenue’s findings suggested there could be a policy loophole that required attention.
However, Deloitte partner Joanne McCrae was wary of jumping the gun.
She believed Inland Revenue had to collect more data over a few more years to better understand the extent to which trustees simply weren’t making the payments to charities they’d committed to.
In her experience, she hadn’t seen this to be a problem.
McCrae noted that if a trust allocated funds to a charity, it had a legal liability to that charity, so couldn’t spend the money on something else.
Jenée Tibshraeny is the Herald’s Wellington business editor, based in the Parliamentary press gallery. She specialises in government and Reserve Bank policymaking, economics and banking.