I went to Ireland recently at the invitation of Insurance Ireland to showcase KiwiSaver as that country grapples with out-of-date retirement incomes policies.
Ireland, a country about the same size as New Zealand, still has a plethora of small workplace pension schemes. There are about 160,000, some of dubious quality and many no doubt not particularly transparent or accountable. People may end up with several pension pots because they change jobs and this is hard to manage. But worse, coverage is under 50 per cent of the workforce and, because women's participation in the labour force is low, women are much less likely than men of working age to have a pension scheme. Tax concessions remain an embedded part of the system.
I was shocked to discover how women in Ireland are disadvantaged by the complex and confusing rules for the Irish state pension. Confusingly there are two state pensions: a contributory one that needs a complex history of contributions for a full pension, and a lower alternative non-contributory pension that is stringently income and asset tested.
Sadly, any system that relies on a contributory basis and a means-tested top up will put women at a disadvantage. According to the European Institute for Gender Equality, women get a third less in pension payments than men. Only 16 per cent of women actually qualify for a full state pension and overall, total pension payments are a third less on average than for men.
Recently, the Irish National Women's Council called on the Government to act to close the pensions gap. Many New Zealanders do not appreciate that we offer a model that countries like Ireland can learn from.